You only put mTw at the top because they just won KODE5. You can't truely place one team in the #1 place because not one team dominates EVERY tournament and NEVER gets beat. Like #4 said its a paradox.
It's better having 5-6 teams that are playing at the top of their game because it means anyone can beat anyone (within reason ofc) that the scene is as competitive as possible with no-one being able to predict the outcome of every LAN.
And that my friends is why I hate rankings unless they are done on a sensible system.
Before they were torn - OptX: Warmach1ne, clowN, mOE, p0s, pham <3
Fnatic >= mym = sk = mibr = mtw and that's the ONLY decent order, fnatic is just a very small step over all of those teams, not because of skill but because of their genius chemistry and you wan't them to cut ins or archi, ROFL Anyways, i can't see the point of putting mibr over mym/mtw. Why? Cause of achievements? No way. Cause of skill? That's impossible to say. Don't even try to put mtw 1st after 1 event won, the same thing was with mouz after EM, lawl. And please don't put sk over mym based just on that 3rd place deciding match, because if you have watched it you know hardly any of those teams did care about it and both teams are equal when it comes to recent achievements.
top 5 cs 1.6
2-fnatic
3-mibr
4-mYm
5-SK
2.MYM
3.mTw
4.mibr
5.SK
fnatic > sk
sk > mym
fnatic > mym
fnatic > mibr
mtw > fnatic
paradox. cannot be decided.
roccat aTTaX mouz eSTRO
so..
1 - mibr
2 - fnatic
3 - mtw (they're so fkn good though even before kode5)
4 - mYm
5 - SK
2-mym
3-sk
4-mtw
5-eml/mibr
You only put mTw at the top because they just won KODE5. You can't truely place one team in the #1 place because not one team dominates EVERY tournament and NEVER gets beat. Like #4 said its a paradox.
It's better having 5-6 teams that are playing at the top of their game because it means anyone can beat anyone (within reason ofc) that the scene is as competitive as possible with no-one being able to predict the outcome of every LAN.
And that my friends is why I hate rankings unless they are done on a sensible system.
MIBr
FnATIc
MyMZ
MTw
SK-GAMING
i failZ?
fnatic
mtw
mym
sk
mibr
roccat
the rest
1. mtw
2. fnatic
3. sk
4. mym
5. mibr
6. EG
7. roccat
2-MiBR
3-fnatic
4-SK
5-MYM
2 fnatic
3 mym
4 mibr
5 mtw
1. fnatic
2. SK
3. Mibr
4. mtw
5. MYM/EG
1. fnatic
2. mym
3. mtw
4. sk
5. mibr
mym/sk/mtw somewhere in top5
find a way to make that work and ill be satisfied
Anyways, i can't see the point of putting mibr over mym/mtw. Why? Cause of achievements? No way. Cause of skill? That's impossible to say.
Don't even try to put mtw 1st after 1 event won, the same thing was with mouz after EM, lawl. And please don't put sk over mym based just on that 3rd place deciding match, because if you have watched it you know hardly any of those teams did care about it and both teams are equal when it comes to recent achievements.
SK
EG
mibr
MYM
mibr
sk
mym
mtw
MIBR
SK
MTW
roccat/emulate
but i will make a list of 5 teams who i think are between 1 and 5
mibr
mtw
fnatic
mym
estro
2.