Yeah I made the other thread which kicked up some conspiracys about valve altering their statistics. After making a few posts on the steam forums I got a reply from a Moderator and a Valve employee which pretty much explains everything.
Killah Instinct (Steam forums Moderator) :
QUOTE:It's very hard to get an accurate number through any stats-page, this has to do with different methods, master servers and the various dimensions the data floats in.
Am sure they Steam: Game page is accurate in it's own way, also note it doesn't really tell when those numbers where recorded - same applies to GameSpy (I doubt they are 'live').
For 3rd party mods, just look here (HL2) or here (HL1).
QUOTE:The new stats on our page are based on users who are connected to Steam and what games they report to be playing via Steam.
The stats at other places like GameSpy are based on querying our master servers which simply report whatever games servers have told them. These numbers can be incorrect in several ways. First, game servers sometimes misreport player stats in an attempt to lure players onto their server even though its actually empty. Second, they can be higher at times due to players who are not connected to Steam playing on VAC insecure servers.Third, the third party sites using the master server data sometimes misreport it because of problems like not including TF2 "custom" servers (and the players on them) in their numbers since they have not updated to support our recent changes to the master server protocol to split servers into standard and custom buckets.
I have highlighted the important points he makes
So basicly steam stats only take the data from people playing cs over steam and not from the actual game itself. People who play cs with a crack/don't use steam to play CS are not included in steam statistics (therefore actually hurting our representation)
*note the steam stats page actually says "View Steam players per game"*
Are Steam statistics accurate when it comes to steam users: Yes (Although it could be restricted to the people who run steam friends/steam community while playing
Are Steam statistics accurate when it comes to representing the actual players playing a game: No
"First, game servers sometimes misreport player stats in an attempt to lure players onto their server even though its actually empty" I noticed dozens of servers seem to report 30/32 players when infact they are empty last time I played 1.6. Is it the same in source?
So, that means that more than half of all CS 1.6 are scrub pub players who play on cracked versions of CS 1.6 on non-VAC secured servers. At least now we know in everywhere but China Source > 1.6.
Oh wait not even.. the steam/valve people explained how sites such as GAME MONITOR count statistics that are not accurate at all (the thing where you see a 1.6 server has 30 players, join it and theres no onein it).
#18 read the quotes, they use the master servers and yeah I would find it hard to believe that no more than 500 at most players are "made up"
I couldn't really give two sh*ts how people decide to play the game, its down to the player and their preferences. Also its not just china, a lot of western euros use cracks
#19 even though your exaduration amuses me, its lucky then that most if not all (inc game monitor and amxmodx) filter out bots :)
Potti: Why are you trying to prep-talk me you idiot
but you all complain about the source players bragging about the chart? the 1.6 people were doing exactly the same as what they are doing now witha chart that had higher numbers for 1.6.. amright?
stupid source fanboys, saying 1.6 is dead and that CGS is the "BIG THING", LOL!
source is way "younger" than 1.6, and is already dieing, this is a FACT, everytime you hear a source kiddy saying 1.6 is dead or dieing, they cant even explain why, mainly because there is no reason cuz 1.6 is not dead or even close to dieing, instead they start putting immature comments that make no sense at all.
CGS is a piece of dog SH#T compared to ESWC or any other 1.6 tournament.
1.6 has WAY MORE tournaments and PLAYERS, so you can go shuv CGS up your Ah0le.
Your hiding the facts! CSS is a bad game but you make it look better so you feel you didnt waste your time! YOU DAMN RIGHT KNEW 1.6 WAS THE BEST THING THAT EVER HAPPEND TO YOU. AND NOW YOU LIE ABOUT IT.
Official! Stats explained
Killah Instinct (Steam forums Moderator) :
There "here's" where hyper links to these websites
HL1: http://www.amxmodx.org/newstats.php
HL2: http://sourcemod.net/newstats.php
*note over 100,000 players playing on AMX servers alone ;)*
Jmccaskey (Valve employee) :
I have highlighted the important points he makes
So basicly steam stats only take the data from people playing cs over steam and not from the actual game itself. People who play cs with a crack/don't use steam to play CS are not included in steam statistics (therefore actually hurting our representation)
*note the steam stats page actually says "View Steam players per game"*
Are Steam statistics accurate when it comes to steam users: Yes (Although it could be restricted to the people who run steam friends/steam community while playing
Are Steam statistics accurate when it comes to representing the actual players playing a game: No
Thread: http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/sho..
->
if 1.6 dies blame the cheaters :)
Oh wait not even.. the steam/valve people explained how sites such as GAME MONITOR count statistics that are not accurate at all (the thing where you see a 1.6 server has 30 players, join it and theres no onein it).
But who cares anyway, does it really matter if Source has more players than 1.6? Just stick to whatever the hell you want to play.
I couldn't really give two sh*ts how people decide to play the game, its down to the player and their preferences. Also its not just china, a lot of western euros use cracks
#19 even though your exaduration amuses me, its lucky then that most if not all (inc game monitor and amxmodx) filter out bots :)
How many are left?
source is way "younger" than 1.6, and is already dieing, this is a FACT, everytime you hear a source kiddy saying 1.6 is dead or dieing, they cant even explain why, mainly because there is no reason cuz 1.6 is not dead or even close to dieing, instead they start putting immature comments that make no sense at all.
CGS is a piece of dog SH#T compared to ESWC or any other 1.6 tournament.
1.6 has WAY MORE tournaments and PLAYERS, so you can go shuv CGS up your Ah0le.
CSS is a bad game but you make it look better so you feel you didnt waste your time!
YOU DAMN RIGHT KNEW 1.6 WAS THE BEST THING THAT EVER HAPPEND TO YOU.
AND NOW YOU LIE ABOUT IT.
:[
1.64ever:[
im from jamaica
Submit Comments
Registered Users Only
In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!