i advise those who watch this to, at least, be skeptical. if you're too lazy to find information from independent sources yourself, i suggest watching noam chomsky lectures on youtube.
This comment was edited at 10/08/2008 2:34 PM
warsow.net - free 1v1dm game | Lo = a debate addict
#11 I'm as skeptical as the next man, but the part about international bankers, as well as the theory that jesus is just a symbol that represents what humans have been believing since civilization began were interesting if you've never read up on this stuff.
"[POD]Kate_Winslet (96) : Look at all that blood, -d2v-Tampon"
People who believe that conspiracy theories are bogus are acting just as much on faith as those who believe they are true.
A lot of this stuff in these kinds of movies is pretty much impossible to "debunk." The bottom line is you will never, ever know with even a hint of certainty whether or not the conclusions are true.
It's mainly a mental health issue that determines which side of the fence you are on: paranoid/mentally unhealthy people are more likely to believe they are true, wheras mentally healthy/level-headed people are more likely to believe they are all bogus. But if you asked either example in this case to conclusively support what they believe, they would be utterly unable to do so.
if you watch it pay attention to part II about how the US has consistently attacked and removed democraticly elected leaders for economic reasons. The US has consistently undermined democracy all over the world to guard it's corporate interests, that's why so many people hate us, the Iranians among them.
regardless of the validity of the movies, i believe the important thing to take away is to not be afraid to questions things, and to seek whatever answer personally gratifies yourself
Naghokez, not saying your debunk is wrong (or the one which you found), though it would be useful to reference your sources, because if I remember correctly, zeitgeist actually had some sort of bibliography. even if it didn't, your post is really worthless without referencing.
Zeitgeist: Addendum
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7..
Zeitgeist: Addendum
i advise those who watch this to, at least, be skeptical. if you're too lazy to find information from independent sources yourself, i suggest watching noam chomsky lectures on youtube.
nothing came outta it besides some "conspiracry theories"
the rest is way too tin foil hat
:0
just saw it online
rest of the movie was kinda =/
A lot of this stuff in these kinds of movies is pretty much impossible to "debunk." The bottom line is you will never, ever know with even a hint of certainty whether or not the conclusions are true.
It's mainly a mental health issue that determines which side of the fence you are on: paranoid/mentally unhealthy people are more likely to believe they are true, wheras mentally healthy/level-headed people are more likely to believe they are all bogus. But if you asked either example in this case to conclusively support what they believe, they would be utterly unable to do so.
http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=15480..
no, i think it's "to seek the truth"