EverLAN reconfirmed their NA power added to their ESWC USA win.

Group play claimed them at ESWC, at least they won't have to worry about that at CPL.

Should be the highest non-attending Winter CPL team after their huge ESWC win.

Again didn't attend last CPL and beyond ESWC they weren't much outside of Denmark.

Last CPL's 7th place finish leaves them right at it again plus EverLAN confirmed their new lineup can play with the big boys.

With the addition of da bears and t0oL along with the losses of fRoD and moses, this might hurt their team chemistry that made u5 famous in the first place.

3D finished at 13-16 along with TEC and Gamewyze giving CPL some options ahead of TSG.

Such a huge name in the community and major CPL sponsors with a CPL 13-16 placement last event.

Where do we start? They need to turn the tide of growing poor results if they want to change the communities' outlook on them.

CPL has been good to them, 8th last event was actually an off-year, a good seed should be a given.

Well beyond having a little inconsistency they haven’t been to any of the major LAN events in the USA, ESWC or EverLAN.

They benefit from being in CAL-I and winning their division to go along with a 17-24 placement.

Simply haven’t done it at CPL compared to expectations but being Canadian best team its hard to see them not getting a decent seed.

Another team from outside of Europe and America who has been to many CPL's including a 13-16 finish last Winter.

They are just outside of the radar down in South America under mibr's shadow.

Let’s count all of them, 1) CAL dislikes them, 2) CPL probably in turn dislikes them, 3) they got moved down, 4) I know there’s more I’m missing here.

Recently won their division of CAL-P and still have their old roster from previous CPL glories.

It was a while ago when they had a solid CPL finish plus CAL-P isn't CAL-I no matter how hard you want it to be.

A 9-12 finish last CPL should normally mean a very good spot and solid CAL-I play including playoffs.

Well let’s be honest this is a completely different team then the last event, maybe they should switch with Rival they might have a better seed.

A big CPL Spain qualifier win leaves them with a good shot for a top 30 seed.

No experience at CPL and very little name in the community outside of the site they represent.

They have a known name in the community and shouldn't be overlooked when seeding takes place.

A CAL-I finals appearance carries this seed and they have played pretty well at recent LAN events.

Long list here; not well known, not from a proven country of CS and none of their players are known to anyone in America or Europe.

They won the Peru CPL Qualifier and like 4D above them its hard to gauge foreign CPL Qualifier winners as their seed normally reflects the Qualifier they won.

If the Qualifier they won as bad relations with the CPL watch out, also read 4D's reasons for a lower seed and apply here as well.

A CAL-I team with a 24th-32nd placing at the CPL should see a top 24 seed but they could move up if there's any doubts surrounding the European teams above.

Lack of proving in CAL-I with the late addition combined with no stand out wins could be tough to justify placing them over any Europeans that might come up.

Placed 24-32 at the last CPL and if they take that into consideration hardcore they will benefit even more.

Who are they? No CAL-I or major international events outside of the CPL will hurt them.

While not finishing first at CPL Canada they did get a qualifier spot, plus CAL-I should help.

Limited exposure and non-playoff spot in CAL-I should drop them below others with more experience and name.

Team 64, Alternate aTTax, Cyberglobe, Boomtown.cph