Thursday November 26 2009
Counter-Strike
Official Design Partner
Story Header

Counter-Strike: "Checkmate!" Installment #4

By: Michael Lau - Published October 03, 2006 at 2:15 AM EDT - Writer Archive
After a short hiatus, the one and only Michael 'baka' Lau is back with his Checkmate article series. This one is about tactics vs. strategy.


It has been a while since I’ve written an article – partially due to a completely saturated summer schedule and also due to the occasional “Writer’s block” that writers get when their minds are off in another world. But, with the constant encouragement and curiosity of my faithful readers that are kind enough to request another issue, I now announce the continuation of this series.

But, a new start requires a new introduction. In this issue, we’ll sidetrack from the agenda and tackle the postulates of “gaming." We will ask ourselves – what is the difference between strategy and tactics?

However, let’s first re-introduce the purpose of this series:

Counter-Strike, like chess, is more than just the taking of opponent’s pieces (taking down the offense or defense), reading the situations (in-game communication), and experience.

Although these attributes are key essentials to being relatively ‘good’ at the game, what makes some teams and/or individuals better than others is the use of mind games as well as understanding the philosophy behind the different variations and openings (Offensive and Defensive setups).

This series is not just aimed at amateur and intermediate Counter-Strike teams. In fact, this article specifically aims at higher-tier teams that are in the ‘Invite’ levels. These teams often display talented players and outstanding communication. Their individual thinking and team play reflects experience and excellent game sense. However, as explained earlier, that is insufficient; most of these teams have strategies that only mimic the shadows of smart-playing. Their game lacks awareness in the psychology and philosophy of thinking smart.

Then again, this series is not only opinion-based but also completely subjective. It simply amplifies the relations between counter-strike and chess, but does not provide proof and factual evidence. All in all, it is just another perspective we can use when playing the game.

With all that set aside, it is time to explain what to expect from this journey. This series consists of an uncertain number of sections, as time goes by, ideas form and my fingers type. The sections are neither ordered in relations of importance nor chronologically ordered. They are all just faculties within themselves that contribute to the whole picture. What I can reveal however, are the current topics that are actively involved in my head and in this series.

Below are some of these topics, with a little description as a teaser.

The Ultimate Weapon - ‘Predicting’ Part 1 – … the ability to predict is a powerful weapon that more than often will determine the outcome of the game…

Mind Sets: Offense is the Best Defense – You start off with the leet krew model. Are you now the offense or the defense? Think carefully before you answer this...

The Art of Probability – Probability is an art, like other aesthetics it does not provide answers but simply an image or map that allows it to be analyzed and acted upon…

Tactics vs. Strategy – This article

Game Theory – John Nash? Charles Darwin? Prisoner’s Dilemma? What have all these have to do with the game?

Mind Sets: Estimation – They say don’t underestimate your enemy? I say don't overestimate them!

Openings & Variations – The opening move in chess determines your style of play, the pistol round in counter-strike determines your opponents mind set of your style of play… manipulate them to think what you want them to think…

The Ultimate Weapon - ‘Predicting’ Part 2 – Back to step one! Time to upgrade our weapon with everything we now know.

Ok! Let us move on…
Continued (1/4) »
Page:

User Comments

1
56% Ranking 56% Ranking 56% Ranking 56% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

this looks like a very good article
2
94% Ranking 94% Ranking 94% Ranking 94% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

this looks like a good article, but baka is terrible at counter-strike ^^
Find me in #dinked~ <3 ninespot~ "True friends walk in, when the rest walk out." - Henry Young
3
39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

hey paul... go away!
4
17% Ranking 17% Ranking 17% Ranking 17% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Very well written. Congratulations.
5
33% Ranking 33% Ranking 33% Ranking 33% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

orz... was gonna say good article until i saw PRIME ONLY for the following installments ; ;
shiny penny
6
121% Ranking 121% Ranking 121% Ranking 121% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

ROFL AT MIKEY AND HIS CRAZY THOUGHTS . <3<3<3<3<3<3<3

This comment was edited at 10/03/2006 4:14 AM
7
1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Great read, props.
8
12% Ranking 12% Ranking 12% Ranking 12% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

incredible interesting... thx alot
All you touch, and all you see, it's all your life will ever be.
9
15% Ranking 15% Ranking 15% Ranking 15% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

glad to read the article when the author knows what he is talking about :)
10
62% Ranking 62% Ranking 62% Ranking 62% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

baka you tease!
GotFrag CoD and Features Head
11
11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

=] good game ....
12
113% Ranking 113% Ranking 113% Ranking 113% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

gj mike`
13
108% Ranking 108% Ranking 108% Ranking 108% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

I AM LEGEND
14
43% Ranking 43% Ranking 43% Ranking 43% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Very interesting read. Good work.
.
15
28% Ranking 28% Ranking 28% Ranking 28% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

very well written, you got skills man, get out of gotfrag and go write for a magazine or something!
NOR*CAL
16
54% Ranking 54% Ranking 54% Ranking 54% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

this is, speaking purely from a literary perspective, a MASSIVE improvement over your previous works, baka.
17
21% Ranking 21% Ranking 21% Ranking 21% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

amazing article
Impossible Is Nothing
18
29% Ranking 29% Ranking 29% Ranking 29% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

The kind of stuff Gotfrag needs more of. Intelligent and thoughtful discussion about the game.

I have never played any game at as high of a competitive level as I've played Counter-Strike, and only now do I realize how mental other games are (like physical sports or chess) and how similar ideas come to play in them all. Because Counter-Strike has little or no heritage in the way of formal analysis, I've always seen one of my goals to improve this state of affairs as best I can.

I wouldn't mind having a discussion with you since you seem to have similar goals, and you also seem well educated on the topic of psychology of games. I am interested in writing so-inclined pieces for Gotfrag but I find it particularly difficult to construct Counter-Strike from first principles with no education of game theory and sports psychology (but I'm working on getting educated).

Now on to my critique. The first part of your article where you divide the game of Counter-Strike into strategy and tactics (and further subdivisions) left me a bit unfulfilled, because you did not elaborate on your ideas, but perhaps you didn't have enough space in the article or had an interest in keeping it concise. As far as your analysis that philosophy and mind-games differentiate high level players from the rest, I would tend to agree if the game of Counter-Strike was as well mapped out as opening variations in Chess. But in a game as new as Counter-Strike, new ideas that give you a slight metagame advantage over your opponent (new flash angle, new spam spot, in short, new tactic) can win a crucial round and turn around the momentum of an entire match. Innovation to break the chain of prediction and counter-prediction will endlessly win you rounds, and only knowledgeable, experienced players have the resources necessary to innovate constantly while they play.

Anyway good job on the article, I'm greatly interested in seeing the next installments.

This comment was edited at 10/03/2006 6:52 AM
No one ever clutched a round by saving.
19
33% Ranking 33% Ranking 33% Ranking 33% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

You take too long to explain your ideas because you're busy making something sound more complex than it actually is. It's tedius waiting for you to get to the point every paragraph. Stop worrying about how intelligent it sounds when you write and just deal with the nitty gritty. Especially when writing about games on a gaming website, where half your readers have ADD. There's no need to use words that most of the people on here will have to look up at dictionary.com to understand.
hello

*yawn*
Life is what you make of it. Dreams are what you live for.
21
15% Ranking 15% Ranking 15% Ranking 15% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Great read, keep up the good work
22
44% Ranking 44% Ranking 44% Ranking 44% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#19 wins , you added so much uneeded fluff to the article.
#Premier! Texas LAN team competing in CAL-Ripken
23
56% Ranking 56% Ranking 56% Ranking 56% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Baka i love you!
#natural \\ #latenite \\ #ottawa

Nice, I really like these articles :D
~ Y ~ o ~ U ~ r ~ E ~ ~ t ~ H ~ e ~ ~ S ~ h ~ E ~ p ~ H ~ e ~ R ~ d ~
25
10% Ranking 10% Ranking 10% Ranking 10% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

good read to bad it had to be about something every one already knows... well sept the new guys
26
48% Ranking 48% Ranking 48% Ranking 48% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Good read but took to long to read everything.
#iLLest
27
23% Ranking 23% Ranking 23% Ranking 23% Ranking
GotFrag Prime!
0 Frags
+   -

b2c for lyfe!!!
My crosshair is large and in charge
28
74% Ranking 74% Ranking 74% Ranking 74% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

1. e4 c5
2.h4!!>?>?!?!??
#lostprophets
29
4% Ranking 4% Ranking 4% Ranking 4% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

was a good read
gj
30
66% Ranking 66% Ranking 66% Ranking 66% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

I'd say military theory has at least as many, or more, parrellels to CS as chess. Often called the initiative - if you're attacking you're winning, react to what the opponent does and you're playing a losing game. Good article though.
[b]GotFrag Features Writer[/b]
31
24% Ranking 24% Ranking 24% Ranking 24% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

pretentious and overwraught. could have said the same thing in one page. interesting ideas, but it felt like it was written for college professors, not gamers.

and i thought counterstrike was a video game...
33
10% Ranking 10% Ranking 10% Ranking 10% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

well written.
34
39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#25

It's one thing knowing and another thing understanding. Knowledge is the most powerful tool we have :)

#27

B2C !!!
35
24% Ranking 24% Ranking 24% Ranking 24% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

I have to agree with a few others, definitely tried to sound too smart. Kind of felt like I was reading The Origin of Species again. If this was a submission for college or university, it'd play well to its audience of the teacher that's grading you. But with your audience here mainly being teens, most won't understand and will just say 'awesome read' cause they see big words and actual formed sentences, which is rare on Gotfrag, so they assume it's good.
Word.

great read
37
39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Stop trying to demean "teenagers" as though their sense of rationality and/or knowledge of their own language is lower than yours.

Maturity/Immaturity does not correlate with intelligence, one is a rites of passage, the other is the product of education.

Especially #19 (cole-) to make such a generalization as to say: "where half your readers have ADD" really makes other question your intelligence.

It's important that a writer's work is criticized and evaluated, but leave the readers out of this - don't discriminate someone with a mole on their face when there's a pebble in your eye. :)
38
39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#37

You should have read their main points and not quoted single lines and used that. They have a valid point. The article was good and definitely something this community needs, but it was much wordier than it needed to be, and that made it lack content. You could have said four times as much with the same space. I majored in English for a few years before switching and although I still struggle with a lot of concepts, being so verbose isn't needed anywhere, let alone in a video game community.
#afterwind all day
39
39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

I do not deny the criticism, I never argued the against the fact that the article may be a bit "wordy". What I don't appreciate is the fact that there are some who stoop as low as to demeaner the readers as well - challenging their intelligence. That's just wrong.
40
24% Ranking 24% Ranking 24% Ranking 24% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

I certainly wasn't demeaning the readers. It's interesting that you'd try to turn the tides and make it as though we are doing something negative. I was more so criticizing your article and that you fail to write for the appropriate audience.

It would be the equivalent of me writing a quantitive economics growth paper in relation to the average gamer on Gotfrag. Do you really think people will catch the important parts if I made it wordy as you did? Certainly, as you said, maturity doesn't necessarily correlate to intelligence, but I don't see many news agencies go into concepts the average layperson probably won't understand.
Word.
41
39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

News agencies relay news to it's readers. It is meant to be specific and unbias - allowing the reader to conclude on the piece of information.

However, the same news papers/sites have columns for it's writer's to relay their bias and subjective views. Some viewers enjoy these columns as it's an art. In fact, it's meant to be an art - an aesthetic for many to unveil.

Granted that I may have failed in reflecting important parts and explaining certain details. But it is my style of writing - some read it for interest and curiousity, some don't. I write with the intention of tickling the former.

This comment was edited at 10/03/2006 2:55 PM
42
101% Ranking 101% Ranking 101% Ranking 101% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

I do enjoy these articles, but this one had very little relation to chess. A few mentions of it here and there, but it was basically just an analysis of strategy and tactics.
43
30% Ranking 30% Ranking 30% Ranking 30% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

This article introduces nothing new, especially for "invite" level players.
45
25% Ranking 25% Ranking 25% Ranking 25% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

LAU.. i thought it was good man -- you brought up concepts that most of us already know, but don't really take the time to think about -- if people actually thought about them and tried to implement changes in their game based on stuff you introduced here, it would definitely improve their team game - good read playA

mo
46
6% Ranking 6% Ranking 6% Ranking 6% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

very good read, and for all the people trying to say "you make it more complex than it has to be," well if he tryed to make it simpler, then half the people wouldnt understand it. He is trying to get across the point that counter-strike isnt just about rushing one site and shooting people, there is logic behind the whole game, and that is what makes it such a competitive one at that. I have to say that now i understand why the make all the more complex articles prime only.

It is true that many high experienced playes might already have knowledge of this but if you think of it, i dought that many of them even thought to bring it up when they were considering strats or thinking "moves" through.

very good article

This comment was edited at 10/03/2006 7:26 PM
47
12% Ranking 12% Ranking 12% Ranking 12% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

nice article scrub, never knew u write for gotfrag, u should just focus on writing and quit cs cuz u suck at it xP
48
66% Ranking 66% Ranking 66% Ranking 66% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

nice read
lawl
49
1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

give the man a break. well done baka
<(º_º)>
50
23% Ranking 23% Ranking 23% Ranking 23% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

yeah, most of us already know the things you were saying. we just never took the time to actually stop and realize that we knew it. thanks for doing it for us.

More Pages

Submit Comments

Registered Users Only

In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!

Latest Poll