Friday November 27 2009
Counter-Strike
Official Design Partner
Story Header

Counter-Strike: Checkmate: Good Game! Issue #5

By: Michael Lau - Published November 03, 2006 at 6:25 PM EST - Writer Archive
In this, the fifth and final chapter of the "Checkmate: Good Game" series, Michael 'baka' Lau discusses how to keep from defeating yourself.


This series is near its end, with this last installment left to fulfill. In this series we’ve tackled the mechanical and the psychological aspect of Counter-Strike by relating it to the game of Chess. Hopefully we are now more aware of the importance of predictability, probability, stratagem and aggression. However, all these subjects are attributes of the game itself; we’ve never discussed how we as an individual can become more aware and conscious of what goes on around us as well as how teams as a whole can work like one entity.

The matter of fact is, many times when we play this game we are losing to ourselves and not to the enemy. As Chinese saying goes: “One does not get defeated by the foe; one can only be defeated by the self”

In this installment I will show you methods on how to control your mentality, maintain composure and also how teams should function properly. Although not completely related to the game of Chess… who cares!

But before going on I must first give credit to the one who taught me all this, for those who know him he’s referred to as a friend, an influence, a teacher and for those who don’t then he is a man with so much wisdom and integrity that it makes the modern generation shameful. To people like Ninespot, jStar, Thanasi, cody, rockyte, akahn and I (although the list goes on) he’s known as TaJ.

Expect in this installment some very imaginative, often philosophical ways of thinking. If this isn’t your cup of tea then I strongly advise not to carry on with the reading or you’ll simply find it a waste of your time, but for those who take this game seriously then we should discuss relevant topics seriously.

Rings

To be able to think as a team player you must first know how the team functions and what importance you have for the team...

Imagine each player in the team being a ring - depending on the size of the team there can be 5 rings or there can be more, but we’ll assume there are only 5. Now imagine these linking with each other to form a circle with its own perimeter – the circle then is the team. The perimeter of this circle defines the team’s limits and potential. The only chance of its boundary expanding is if each and every single ring increases its own perimeter.

Now, going back to the individual rings, their perimeter defines the player’s individual roles. Each individual has their own specific role in the team and they must fill their own shoes in order for the whole circle to maintain its state. If a player decides to take it upon themselves to step into another teammates ring and fill their roles then that would be injustice as that player’s ring would be larger than the rest and the circle would become deformed. Likewise, if an individual player decides to not fulfill their role then their ring would shrink and again the circle would become deformed. Therefore it is only justice if each player does their job to its perfection, only then can the circle as a whole expand.

The purpose of this analogy is this: there are star players in the team and there are some who do not seem to carry their weight. But each player should have a role; star player's role are to BE star players and carry the team in frags, likewise, the team motivator's role should be to keep the team motivation up. The team cannot function when one person decides to step beyond their boundary, it cannot function when one person decides not to fill his/her own shoes.
Continued (1/3) »
Page:

User Comments

1
7% Ranking 7% Ranking 7% Ranking 7% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

All these installments couldve been resolved with three words.


"Click and shoot."
2
23% Ranking 23% Ranking 23% Ranking 23% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Nice Read
3
39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Nice read, great info. :]
- d(o_o)b -
4
66% Ranking 66% Ranking 66% Ranking 66% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Reading your articles is a lot like reading 'The Art of War'.

Yes, it is very important not to blame the player in a 1v1 that loses for the round/match loss. The other 4 members on his team died, so they must have done something wrong that round too!
[b]GotFrag Features Writer[/b]
5
63% Ranking 63% Ranking 63% Ranking 63% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

That was a good read, nice article.
#gotfrag
6
21% Ranking 21% Ranking 21% Ranking 21% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

nice art
Impossible Is Nothing
7
66% Ranking 66% Ranking 66% Ranking 66% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

TaJ is a very smart guy, and he's very nice as well. I've met him at a few different LANs in VA and had some interesting conversations, and continued into ventrilo afterwards. Learned a lot by playing against him as well as listening to him.
JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY
8
25% Ranking 25% Ranking 25% Ranking 25% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

"Just remember, do what you know because you can’t do what you don’t."

You just can't get any more philosophical than that.
Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac.
9
39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#7

I'm glad you got to meet TaJ :)

Was a nice read :D
11
48% Ranking 48% Ranking 48% Ranking 48% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

baka this is by far the best installment in the series. I mean awesome read. This not only applies to CS, this applies to life. Very great ideas and made some very good points and everything made sense. Iv'e never thought of CS in this way before. Baka, you have helped me open up a new door in my mind by writing this article. Thx man, and again great wrtie up, keep it up and you will be rewarded the nobel prize one day.
If ya flippin' coke or flippin' burgers, get that paper and provide the best service
12
36% Ranking 36% Ranking 36% Ranking 36% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Really good article--and I'm a tough critic! You should write more of them!
A lowly chia-pet.
13
13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

nice analogies!
"Leaders, by their openness to questioning, give followers the confidence to pursue their dreams."
14
39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#11 #12

Thanks for the compliments.. i'll keep it up :)
15
121% Ranking 121% Ranking 121% Ranking 121% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

:O mikey! your a crazy crazy man
16
24% Ranking 24% Ranking 24% Ranking 24% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Really nice series... Loved to read it because it reminded me so much of Sun Tzu and various other philosophical books I've read.

I always take a breather in save rounds now. ;)
*DEAD* EG.shaGuar : i didn't take ur last coconut
17
34% Ranking 34% Ranking 34% Ranking 34% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

nice article baka
better than you
18
13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

bad article.

Psychology is nothing more then an opinion. it can't be proven.

Just like my post.

This comment was edited at 11/03/2006 9:42 PM
19
6% Ranking 6% Ranking 6% Ranking 6% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

ROFL #8
20
39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#18

Psychology is a field of study consisting of many in-depth scientific research that consists of mathematical models far beyond your or my ability to comprehend.

It's definitely not just an opinion. :)

Unless you are to say that all scientific theories are merely opinions.
21
11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

i was on the same team as TaJ good guy. Learned this from him a long time ago
22
4% Ranking 4% Ranking 4% Ranking 4% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

could be more down to earth, without the team circle analogy. ppl here cant be that stupid
23
28% Ranking 28% Ranking 28% Ranking 28% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

can.
カ ン チ ョ
24
13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

actually #20 it is nothing but opinion even clinical psychology is unproven. Psychology is impossible to prove.

But what do i know i'm only a psychology major...and you know the old saying...college students and their "i know everything" mindset.

This comment was edited at 11/03/2006 11:39 PM
25
13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

i'm a mean person and decided to not post this...self-nuke

This comment was edited at 11/03/2006 11:34 PM
26
12% Ranking 12% Ranking 12% Ranking 12% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

nice feature
27
9% Ranking 9% Ranking 9% Ranking 9% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

nice read
<3
#Q-Base @ Gamesurge - QlimaX Crew Multigaming Australia
28
39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking 39% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#24

Psychology bases it's study on the scientific method of observation/hypothesis/implication/modelling, making it an APPLIED science. I dont see how that isn't anything more than an "opinion". Whether it "proves" anything is a completely different question. Many scientific theories do not prove anything either, they're simply models that "work".

You really need to find another school if you're a psychology major, they're teaching you the wrong things.

This comment was edited at 11/04/2006 12:07 AM
29
59% Ranking 59% Ranking 59% Ranking 59% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Good articles I enjoyed them
30
20% Ranking 20% Ranking 20% Ranking 20% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

typo on last page :/ good read tho.

jump down a man hole light urself a candle
32
42% Ranking 42% Ranking 42% Ranking 42% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

I enjoyed that one it showed a new perspective to think of your game from, and all good philosophy provides a new perspective. So good job.

On science though, I think your understanding of it misses the most fundamental part of science. What makes science science is called *falsifiability*, and a lot of psychology skips that part. Freud comes to mind. In fact Freud was one of the main reasons Karl Popper wrote about the scientific philosophy of falsifiability. What it is is basically this: for a hypothesis/idea/whatever to constitute itself as an actual scientific theory, it has to be testable: it has to allow itself to be proven wrong. Take general relativity for example, if Einstein just went off spouting about how gravity is just what curved spacetime seems like to our dull minds, he would be a philosopher, not a scientist. He went beyond that and said that the most direct path that a beam of light can take through a gravitational field is curved. *That* they can test, and they did during the 1919 (i think) eclipse. Popper is pretty much *the man* in philosophy of science, he dealt the whole Vienna Circle singlehandedly.

With Freud however, if he diagnoses somebody as having their childhood development arrested in the phallic stage, how are you supposed to falsify it? It's quack-talk :\ so I'm with 24. But being unscientific doesn't make something wrong, I'm pretty unfamiliar with the the whole world of psych., but I do find merit in evolutionary psychology.
33
16% Ranking 16% Ranking 16% Ranking 16% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

rofl
indepth artical causes indepth debate
34
35% Ranking 35% Ranking 35% Ranking 35% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#32 > #28, 16-0.
Too good for cal-o, too much of a life for cal-m, cal-im for life.
35
1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

this is so retarded. all trying to act sage-ish

Good read enjoyed it!!! :)
37
20% Ranking 20% Ranking 20% Ranking 20% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

liked it :)
38
13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

where do these kids learn english?

as spetznaz said this is alot like reading the art of war. And i LOVED that book and also this is a GREAT read, i wished there were more articles like this one (not only the GG series)
40
1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

good one baka... :)
41
11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

After reading them all, I still don't get the point of the whole series.
I think it's something like pretending to sound too smart, either that or just that the topic was dull
me ftw!!!11!
42
13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#32 It's funny because I was taught about Popper and falsifiability two weeks ago, and the teacher used the EXACT same examples. For Freud he mentioned that he would say to a woman that her dreams were manifestations of her hidden desires, and when she mentioned dreams that wouldn't work with the theory Freud said those particular dreams reflected her desire to prove him wrong... So Freud's idea could not allow itself to be proven wrong, and it therefore went against the falsifiability criteria. Sorry it's kinda hard to translate that from french to english :p
N God said, "Let there be light. Keep da party crackin while I'm steady rappin'": n there was light.
43
141% Ranking 141% Ranking 141% Ranking 141% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

good stuff fellas
Please idle #syncline
44
36% Ranking 36% Ranking 36% Ranking 36% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

[b]stupid[/b]
.::[b]jetty[/b]::.
45
18% Ranking 18% Ranking 18% Ranking 18% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

very good series overall, but what about gambit of a teammate or two for some initiative? :-D
46
9% Ranking 9% Ranking 9% Ranking 9% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Good read there :)
brothers we are divided we fall united we conquer
47
11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

"Just remember, do what you know because you can’t do what you don’t."

Ah, but if great mighty bold Lion would learn to pounce in jungle, like timid house cat would pounce in long grass, would it not have furrier balls?



btw I did actually like that article.
48
25% Ranking 25% Ranking 25% Ranking 25% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

good article
49
46% Ranking 46% Ranking 46% Ranking 46% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

awesome article !
repeLlence - Miami LAN team
50
13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

good read

More Pages

Submit Comments

Registered Users Only

In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!

Latest Poll