|
|||
In this, the fifth and final chapter of the "Checkmate: Good Game" series, Michael 'baka' Lau discusses how to keep from defeating yourself. ![]() The matter of fact is, many times when we play this game we are losing to ourselves and not to the enemy. As Chinese saying goes: “One does not get defeated by the foe; one can only be defeated by the self” In this installment I will show you methods on how to control your mentality, maintain composure and also how teams should function properly. Although not completely related to the game of Chess… who cares! But before going on I must first give credit to the one who taught me all this, for those who know him he’s referred to as a friend, an influence, a teacher and for those who don’t then he is a man with so much wisdom and integrity that it makes the modern generation shameful. To people like Ninespot, jStar, Thanasi, cody, rockyte, akahn and I (although the list goes on) he’s known as TaJ. Expect in this installment some very imaginative, often philosophical ways of thinking. If this isn’t your cup of tea then I strongly advise not to carry on with the reading or you’ll simply find it a waste of your time, but for those who take this game seriously then we should discuss relevant topics seriously. Rings To be able to think as a team player you must first know how the team functions and what importance you have for the team... Imagine each player in the team being a ring - depending on the size of the team there can be 5 rings or there can be more, but we’ll assume there are only 5. Now imagine these linking with each other to form a circle with its own perimeter – the circle then is the team. The perimeter of this circle defines the team’s limits and potential. The only chance of its boundary expanding is if each and every single ring increases its own perimeter. Now, going back to the individual rings, their perimeter defines the player’s individual roles. Each individual has their own specific role in the team and they must fill their own shoes in order for the whole circle to maintain its state. If a player decides to take it upon themselves to step into another teammates ring and fill their roles then that would be injustice as that player’s ring would be larger than the rest and the circle would become deformed. Likewise, if an individual player decides to not fulfill their role then their ring would shrink and again the circle would become deformed. Therefore it is only justice if each player does their job to its perfection, only then can the circle as a whole expand. The purpose of this analogy is this: there are star players in the team and there are some who do not seem to carry their weight. But each player should have a role; star player's role are to BE star players and carry the team in frags, likewise, the team motivator's role should be to keep the team motivation up. The team cannot function when one person decides to step beyond their boundary, it cannot function when one person decides not to fill his/her own shoes. |






User Comments
"Click and shoot."
Yes, it is very important not to blame the player in a 1v1 that loses for the round/match loss. The other 4 members on his team died, so they must have done something wrong that round too!
You just can't get any more philosophical than that.
I'm glad you got to meet TaJ :)
Thanks for the compliments.. i'll keep it up :)
I always take a breather in save rounds now. ;)
Psychology is nothing more then an opinion. it can't be proven.
Just like my post.
Psychology is a field of study consisting of many in-depth scientific research that consists of mathematical models far beyond your or my ability to comprehend.
It's definitely not just an opinion. :)
Unless you are to say that all scientific theories are merely opinions.
But what do i know i'm only a psychology major...and you know the old saying...college students and their "i know everything" mindset.
<3
Psychology bases it's study on the scientific method of observation/hypothesis/implication/modelling, making it an APPLIED science. I dont see how that isn't anything more than an "opinion". Whether it "proves" anything is a completely different question. Many scientific theories do not prove anything either, they're simply models that "work".
You really need to find another school if you're a psychology major, they're teaching you the wrong things.
On science though, I think your understanding of it misses the most fundamental part of science. What makes science science is called *falsifiability*, and a lot of psychology skips that part. Freud comes to mind. In fact Freud was one of the main reasons Karl Popper wrote about the scientific philosophy of falsifiability. What it is is basically this: for a hypothesis/idea/whatever to constitute itself as an actual scientific theory, it has to be testable: it has to allow itself to be proven wrong. Take general relativity for example, if Einstein just went off spouting about how gravity is just what curved spacetime seems like to our dull minds, he would be a philosopher, not a scientist. He went beyond that and said that the most direct path that a beam of light can take through a gravitational field is curved. *That* they can test, and they did during the 1919 (i think) eclipse. Popper is pretty much *the man* in philosophy of science, he dealt the whole Vienna Circle singlehandedly.
With Freud however, if he diagnoses somebody as having their childhood development arrested in the phallic stage, how are you supposed to falsify it? It's quack-talk :\ so I'm with 24. But being unscientific doesn't make something wrong, I'm pretty unfamiliar with the the whole world of psych., but I do find merit in evolutionary psychology.
indepth artical causes indepth debate
I think it's something like pretending to sound too smart, either that or just that the topic was dull
Ah, but if great mighty bold Lion would learn to pounce in jungle, like timid house cat would pounce in long grass, would it not have furrier balls?
btw I did actually like that article.
More Pages
Submit Comments
Registered Users Only
In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!