Thursday November 26 2009
Counter-Strike
Official Design Partner
Story Header

Counter-Strike: The Adjustable Defense

By: Chris Boutte - Published October 28, 2004 at 1:31 AM EDT - Writer Archive
Bootman is here to bring us the Adjustable Defense. In the recent months he has shown us the power of playbooks, which are are all based around the "predictable defense" theory. In this article bootman aims to prove that it is time to see much more in-depth defenses coming from the top teams around the world.
In two of my more recent articles I brought up my "predictable defense"
theory. It is basically the idea that all Counter-Strike players choose to play a small, select number of setups in defending their bombsites, due to that fact that they have had the most success in the past from playing these spots. Playbooks do the homework for teams, but the reality is that if you understand this theory, you can break down a team's defense in about twenty minutes.

In this first portion of the article, before I begin to go map by map, I will explain some basic styles of defense. Once you understand these different types of defense, the number of possibilities for setups and cross-fires becomes nearly infinite.

Standard setups: These are the easiest and most basic setups - setups that pretty much anybody who plays competitive Counter-Strike knows and understands. We see this mostly with lower tier teams (CAL-O/IM) that don't put too much thought behind their defense.

Some examples are:
de_dust2: 1 B, 1 middle, 2 catwalk, 1 long A.
de_inferno: 2 crossfire middle, 1 hallways, 2 B.
de_nuke: 1 outside, 1 floor in upper bombsite, 1 rafters, 2 ramp room.
de_train: 1 alley, 1 middle, 1 ladder, 1 inner top ramp, 1 inner low ramp.
de_cbble: 1 left halls, 1 middle, 2 close bombsite B, 1 sniper in the back of the site.

These setups areas are most common because they are easiest and most obvious to someone intially surveying the maps.

Aggressive setups: These setups are for teams that have great colt skill (they are rarely played with an AWP) and also have a great flash & peek style of play. These are teams that play in a sort of standard setup, but will continuously pressure attacking offenses. A great example of this style is team Rival.

Defensive setups: First off, I would like to say that this used to be a great tactic before the money system change. However, now that terrorists receive money for just getting the bomb down, a defensive setup is a horrible tactic when played against a decent team. These kinds of setups are all about teamwork. The defensive setup is based off of playing far back or overloading one part of a site (i.e. catwalk on de_dust2 or spawn side on de_inferno). The reason why this is risky is that, obviously, while one side of the map is stacked, another part is severely undermanned (i.e. hallways on de_inferno or outside on de_nuke). The logic behind this tactic is that as the Counter-Terrorist team, you have enough trust in your ability to retake bombsites. More than often, teams give up multiple bomb plants because of this setup, which is why I don't favor defensive setups with the new money system.

Now that we have briefly gone over each of these setups, take a second to imagine if a team used the three of these randomly throughout a match? Can you imagine the number of individual play styles each of the five players could have for all of these setups? It kind of makes you wonder why we don’t see the best of the best doing this more often.

In the rest of this article I will go over several maps and explain how each of these setups can be used.
Continued (1/6) »
Page:

User Comments

2
44% Ranking 44% Ranking 44% Ranking 44% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

^^^^^
3
30% Ranking 30% Ranking 30% Ranking 30% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Nice article :]
4
38% Ranking 38% Ranking 38% Ranking 38% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

holy crap thats long :O
5
41% Ranking 41% Ranking 41% Ranking 41% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

please stop writing articles acting like you know what you're talking about. really.
6
13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

great article, a news will be posted on www.counter-strike.nu :D
7
41% Ranking 41% Ranking 41% Ranking 41% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Uh oh, if you don't kiss bootman's ass, you get nuked.
8
30% Ranking 30% Ranking 30% Ranking 30% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

What'd #5 say?
9
56% Ranking 56% Ranking 56% Ranking 56% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

holy crap bootman i love you
like a straight guy loves a straight guy. you know
i got that jaypee wiggle
10
16% Ranking 16% Ranking 16% Ranking 16% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

nice writeup

if you're gonna criticize #7 at least give a reason
11
5% Ranking 5% Ranking 5% Ranking 5% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

n1 bootman...luv your articles, keep up the good work :)
12
30% Ranking 30% Ranking 30% Ranking 30% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

the whole point of it is, that u need a concept for the match and not only for single rounds.
btw: this doesnt mean its a bad article, gj :p

This comment was edited at 10/28/2004 4:28 AM
13
5% Ranking 5% Ranking 5% Ranking 5% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Nice conclusion...liked your article :-)
14
62% Ranking 62% Ranking 62% Ranking 62% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#5...
plz
"In order to find his equal, an Irishman is forced to talk to God."
15
26% Ranking 26% Ranking 26% Ranking 26% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

nice man im fairly new to cs but me n my team have skill but just not alot of strats so this is a bit of a help :)
16
8% Ranking 8% Ranking 8% Ranking 8% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Roger nice bootman, if it wasn't for page six I would've said gj stating the obvious but you covered your back on that one.

pics would be nice.
18
25% Ranking 25% Ranking 25% Ranking 25% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

I really enjoyed reading this and I totally agree with everything. I am a BIG fan of agressive ct setups and think they work more times than not, and its almost a necessity with the new money system as you pointed out. Teams always underestimate the importance of good defensive setups and adapting to the offenses style of play.
#teamc9
19
34% Ranking 34% Ranking 34% Ranking 34% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#18 get off my name scrub =P
20
44% Ranking 44% Ranking 44% Ranking 44% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

rather interesting article, out to prove a point to a certain team? ;ooo
I am not cool.
21
16% Ranking 16% Ranking 16% Ranking 16% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

At least you tried.
22
38% Ranking 38% Ranking 38% Ranking 38% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

top teams probably dont spend time before each event revamping ct setups because they have faith in their individual skill.
listen to the beach boys.
23
42% Ranking 42% Ranking 42% Ranking 42% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

really nice read dude ;p sounds like DEL is cut about something
IM A KIXER FAN
24
19% Ranking 19% Ranking 19% Ranking 19% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#12 The point just is to know what your opponent basic defensive strats are, and to use diverse strats yourself (that fit your team)

#16 i was thinking the same thing ;p

i've always been a proponent of aggressive ct setups, and basically doing really unpredictable things as ct (as well as t btw)
also a good thing to remember is to never do something alone as ct (except for when u have an AWP, or when u cover something from close range like train ladder room) but that's also obvious ;p
25
20% Ranking 20% Ranking 20% Ranking 20% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

bootman does playbooks even for cal-o and cal-im... what a great guy =).
26
54% Ranking 54% Ranking 54% Ranking 54% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

if you look at some of the teams doing really well in cal-i atm you can see the whole attention to detail and diversity in ct setups coming thru nicely. in particular im thinking of eco here - they tend to switch it up from round to round and control the flow of the game very well by doing this. 3d @ wcg, u5 and tec @ cal-i are also teams that have impressed me with their ct sides, too.

This comment was edited at 10/28/2004 8:23 AM
27
70% Ranking 70% Ranking 70% Ranking 70% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

i was surprised to see how much my team uses the basic setup...and i can see it works because we are in a lower tier of play
eLement.cs forever
28
12% Ranking 12% Ranking 12% Ranking 12% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Well written as usual bootman; gj.

#22, you are completely and utterly wrong.
#hitpoint CALmain
29
71% Ranking 71% Ranking 71% Ranking 71% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

So, um basically, you wrote an article telling anyone who's played in clan CS for more than 6 months, everything they alreay know. It's fairly well written and everything, but what is the point? Admitting that you've done that doesn't make it any better.

This comment was edited at 10/28/2004 9:09 AM
30
21% Ranking 21% Ranking 21% Ranking 21% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

To be fair, just because most players know this already doesn't mean they put it into practice. It's one thing to come up with a few different styles of CT play, but quite another to execute them perfectly.
Firesomething ~ I know the human being and the fish can coexist peacefully.
31
15% Ranking 15% Ranking 15% Ranking 15% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

nice article
32
71% Ranking 71% Ranking 71% Ranking 71% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Yea, that maybe true abla, but an article can't help you execute strategies or improve teamplay can it? So my point still remains.
33
17% Ranking 17% Ranking 17% Ranking 17% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#29 Yeah everyone knows it... but almost no one do it.

Nice article.
34
5% Ranking 5% Ranking 5% Ranking 5% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Everything was nice and fine, til you started acting like you knew better then the top teams.
35
64% Ranking 64% Ranking 64% Ranking 64% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Very nice article bootman. I like the conclusion :P
36
38% Ranking 38% Ranking 38% Ranking 38% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

I love how a kid from apathy tries to say something negative about the article like he knows anything. Does apathy even have a non forfeit win yet? Del, you guys must have amazing strats, do you make them yourself?

The article points out the fact that people complain about needing new maps, when there are MANY variations that could be used on not only terrorist strats, but CT set ups/stacks/strats. I found it pretty interesting. But it does sorta seem like a shot at teams who complained about his playbooks giving away their strats/positions. =p
It's not what I say, it's how you'll remember me.
37
44% Ranking 44% Ranking 44% Ranking 44% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

mm, Good article :D

This comment was edited at 10/28/2004 1:10 PM
38
29% Ranking 29% Ranking 29% Ranking 29% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

wow #5, at least give him props for the amount of time he spent working on it. maybe some of it is obvious and pretty regular in scrims, but you read the article didn't you? if you thought he had nothing good to say, don't finish reading it n come here n flame. grow up kid.

bootman: nj man, always enjoy reading ur articles, altho i disagree w/ some =P (ps - miscellaneous setups are the best =P)
www.xanga.com/dbai18 --- Alpha Sigs Represent! #hybrid.usa
39
12% Ranking 12% Ranking 12% Ranking 12% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Very nice article bootman. I just noticed how much o/im teams really do play defensively, even with the new money system.
40
4% Ranking 4% Ranking 4% Ranking 4% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

very nice article the end kind of made me think a bit and what my team needs to do for future times...
D0nt r045t th3 g0053
41
49% Ranking 49% Ranking 49% Ranking 49% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Bootman sackriders.
42
8% Ranking 8% Ranking 8% Ranking 8% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

nice article, would've enjoyed pics tho...
btw many spelling mistakes :O
#cTeteam
43
5% Ranking 5% Ranking 5% Ranking 5% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Nice Job Bootman.
44
126% Ranking 126% Ranking 126% Ranking 126% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

your agressive setups seem to be just flash/peek
«Call a friend, call bongy.»
45
41% Ranking 41% Ranking 41% Ranking 41% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

You act like God gave you the wisdom to share such cunning, magical Counter-Strike knowledge to the public. When, in fact, in large part, you're wrong on so many levels.

Before I give my rebuttal to the crap I've been reading for some months now. I would just like to say I'm advocating the countless world class teams that you have bashed.

Every sport that has a "standard defense." The reason for this is, it most logically makes sense defensively. Sure they could adjust to the style of a player. For example, in baseball, how come 3 people don't play left field when facing a right-handed batter? Even though 80% of the time a right-handed batter hits the ball in that direction? Because players at these levels have the ability to adjust. That’s right. A right-handed batter would obviously see the gaping hole in right field, and has the ability to adjust to that defense and send the ball in the opposite direction. I guess you could call this the, “Adjustable OFFENSE theory.”

Yes it’s hard to compare a sport like baseball, to competitive Counter-Strike, but the same logic and theory applies to anything competitive.

Professional teams are able to spot, scout and recognize the glaring weakness left by using a “non-standard” CT setup. This is often the case even on lower tier teams. For someone who plays counter-strike competitively, how come ECO round bombsite stacks hardly ever work? It’s very rare, at least on a main level, which an entire team actually comes into the stacked site. It’s done through scouting and playing by ear. Which I think you undermine at this level.

There’s also more of a risk factor involved when either playing aggressive or passive. I’ve heard you say that it’s a “risk” worth taking. Sure, you’re absolutely right – when it works. Though how about the times when it doesn’t? Was it still worth it? Obviously not. Taking unnecessary risks only lead to one thing, and one thing only: INCONSISTENCY. I can assure you, between teams that takes more risks and teams that takes less risks, one will appear to be a lot more consistent in their results.

Not one single world class team is ever predictable on their offense. World class teams have a wide, wide variety of attacks on either bombsite. I guarantee you, you wouldn’t be able to tell me with certainty what SK was going to do on offense, when say they’re say, leading the game 8-2 as T’s on dust2, and they went B 7/10 times. Pretend you tell your team to play the 1-2-2 setup, and you luck out, they went B and you win the round. Okay, but what about the next round? Or the next? You cannot keep taking risks like these because you will lose in the long run – it’s inevitable.

Standard defenses are not at all predictable. You’ve done a SK play book, tell me, you know exactly where SpawN will be playing bombsite B using a standard defense on inferno round by round? No. Of course you’ll know he’ll be there, but unsure of his exact location. That’s not so “predictable” anymore is it? It’s like a batter trying to guess the exact location of a pitch. Of course he knows it’ll be someone in the vicinity of home plate. But does he know the exact location? That makes a big difference.
46
34% Ranking 34% Ranking 34% Ranking 34% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

nice article,very informative. I will probably now think about all the dif variations of style that my individual team can play.
47
75% Ranking 75% Ranking 75% Ranking 75% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

ECO best ct strats in NA.
if anything will drive you crazy prematurely its the gigabyte commercial
48
27% Ranking 27% Ranking 27% Ranking 27% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

gotta agree with #45, it seems as if you are just wanting to see more exciting matches on hltv

aint gon happen
I tried seeing things from your point of view but I cant seem to get my head that far up my ass.
49
9% Ranking 9% Ranking 9% Ranking 9% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#45 WINS

bootman, get a life
50
6% Ranking 6% Ranking 6% Ranking 6% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Wow...I have to say I agree with DEL on this one. I mean yes the standard setup on a map is predictable but it works. And I wouldnt tell my team to go stack A or stack B or play one site more aggressive than the other UNLESS the situation in the "Specific" match calls for it. I mean, if Im winning 9-1 on CT Im not gonna change up what I'm doing just for the hell of it, I'll stick to what is working until the offense adjusts to my defense. Nonetheless, a good article, I enjoyed reading it and I see where ur coming from, but I also agree with DEL that, in the end, it all depends on the situation of the match etc.

More Pages

Submit Comments

Registered Users Only

In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!

Latest Poll