|
|||
A CPL Champion always has more pressure the event after its accomplishment, NoA will get to feel that in a brand new country. Accused often of being inconsistent, NoA still has many question marks surrounding them. Trevor “Midway” Schmidt looks back at the CPL run looking for chinks in the NoA armor. ![]() Hundreds of excited fans stare up at an ominous, darkened stage. They watch in silence at the lit faces staring intently forward and the silhouettes flickering against a back wall. Without any warning explosive wrist flicking and the loud barking of commands shatter the calm. Monitors go black, one by one, as each player makes a fatal mistake. Blackness envelops the stage bit by bit, heaping more and more pressure and attention on those still living, until movement ceases and the stage rests in pitch-black. Seconds later it glows with monitor hue and a new round begins. The Winter CPL 2004 proved the final arrival of a team that two years ago came up short. At the Winter CPL 2003, NoA came out of nowhere to defeat many top teams on the road to a disappointing finals loss against SK.swe. Last year saw a difference. A championship sized difference.
Don’t be confused; it has been a rough journey for the only truly International team in Counter-Strike. At points last year they came within practically nothing of being just another road bump in the history of CS. From disappointing finishes at Summer CPL 2004 and Nollevla to very hard win at EverLAN, nothing was easy, and thus none of the players expected their first (of hopefully many) CPL Championship to be. Before they can worry about future CPL’s, they’ll have to get past seven other teams in Korea for the World eSports Games, also known as WEG. The past CPL could hold the keys for either a success or failure in Korea. Let’s start in the Championship game against EYEballers. While the second match on Inferno was a rout with a NoA victory, 16-5, the first map proved both intriguing and exciting, 16-14. |







User Comments
nice write up tho.
damn that's good. i keep noticing you mispelling shag's name.. bengar? lol
good article midway
It was one year ago, at Winter CPL 2003.
Shag's name is spelled *Benger, not "Bengar".
"thus none of the players expected their first (of hopefully many) CPL Championship to be."
I hope that you realize Element and XeqtR have both won CPL Championships in the past.
"Bengar, Jonas "XeqtR" Johannessen and Luke "Naikon" Olaisen"
Their names are Benger, Jorgen, and Lars. NOT Bengar, Jonas, and Luke...
"NoA attacked the ramp two straight times to open the match, resulting in losses both times, but each were clean entrances."
Don't know which demo you downloaded, but NoA won the 2nd round in the won I watched.
"Even though NoA won the first half 10-5 before the flash bug ruling changed it to a 10-5 score for EYE, it really looked like NoA was uncoordinated at times."
NoA won 9-6 before the flash bug ruling changed it to 10-5.
"Moum played ramp with support from Johannessen, where it felt like the two didn't communicate well."
With a statement like that one would assume you would back your points up... but I see no evidence.
"Moum honestly would have been a better fit in the upper bombsite because his aggressive style of play fits well attacking the choke through the hut at critical times."
This is more of an opinion rather than a fact, but I think the general opinion of top players is that ramp room is better for aggressive players.
"Still, Begrip barely tested the defense of bombsite B, opting to test So in bombsite A more often. This probably was a mistake as they would have been more effective smoking and attacking Bengar at bombsite B after their initial success in the first five rounds."
Well, Begrip went up 5-0 by testing site A. Once they started losing there they tried to attack BengER in B, but that failed twice in a row, even when they did smoke, attack, huff, and puff. I guess they just couldn't blow the house down :(
Such as...
[ "thus none of the players expected their first (of hopefully many) CPL Championship to be."
I hope that you realize Element and XeqtR have both won CPL Championships in the past. ]
It would help if you read what I wrote, maybe that's not a requirement where you work but... The comment was meant of the team NoA, not the players but maybe they have won some Championships as NoA I have never heard of...
[ "Moum played ramp with support from Johannessen, where it felt like the two didn't communicate well."
With a statement like that one would assume you would back your points up... but I see no evidence. ]
It's an opinion article the whole thing is what I think. If you don't agree fine.
Don't know which demo you downloaded, but NoA won the 2nd round in the ONE I watched.
Come on if you're gonna do that to good'ol midway you should make sure the grammar you're using is correct.
Where I work when we say players in a comment it means the players, not the team the players play in. If you wanted to talk about the team you should have used the word team.
Where I work we support our opinions with hard evidence and fact. Something you failed to do.. making your opinion, and essentially the whole article (since it was "an opinion article"), weak. Let bootman do the playbooks.
#29 sorry. Stay out of this. But while you are crying about grammar, what is "good'ol" ? It certainly isn't a word I've ever heard of.
Submit Comments
Registered Users Only
In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!