... read please on the articles before you start asking. hyper disputed verge after getting owned basically and they got the match overturned due to no demos being recorded.
hmm so they agree not to record demos, then hyper dispute, God im gonna do that next time i wanna win a match in CAL-EU. Hyper's new strat = lame but effective.
STRuck was the disputed player, since no one has said it yet. I'll admit he was playing abnormally well, but that's not to underrate him. He did have an amazing series of shot at catwalk at one point the match, but if we don't see him leave the team, that will be enough proof that he was wrongly accused.
#14 welcome to the present time - he is on forbiden roster now he (and paradox) were before they went into the playoffs - they were just helping verge out and finishing off the rest of the season with the roster lock (and ofc trying to win cashmoney).
hyper hasnt done anything to boost their reputation imo - but it was their call
I think at this level of the game players should have to take in sum proffessionalism, im not sure if its cos css players are generally younger, but this kinds thing doesnt happen in 1.6 or other fps's and yu dont get little kids like nightfall in those games either.
Verge are a lan proven team, whereas hyper arnt and disputing them was a little low
wtf is wrong with u people? The player that they just happened to think was suspicious, is the player who cant provide a demo? Watch the demo col against verge. Struk sucked and suddenly he is their best player? No demo = Cheat
#14 Him and Paradox are already set to leave the team to go and join Forbidden. This is old news. The verGe line-up you saw in the playoffs was a defunct line-up.
Anyway, people need to quit saying that both teams agreed to not record. That isn't true. Verge decided not to record on their own. They carelessly chose to not follow policy and payed for it.
Or who knows, maybe Struk really did toggle since he doesn't care about verGe anymore and assumed Hyper! would be shady themselves, told his team about it afterwards, and as a unit they decided to just claim the whole team didn't record to help Struk out. /conspiracytheory
Seriously though, there's plenty of reasons to have a dim opinion of Hyper! now, especially after what a joke they were in the finals, but there was nothing wrong with them deciding to dispute a player, LAN-proven or not. [b]Obviously.[/b] So quit whining about it.
!-- Begin comScore Tag -->
verge dispute
stupid nerd.
p.s. why does everyone insist on making their own thread about a topic that already has 3489754398 new threads?
Hyper's new strat = lame but effective.
hyper hasnt done anything to boost their reputation imo - but it was their call
SOL
Verge are a lan proven team, whereas hyper arnt and disputing them was a little low
Anyway, people need to quit saying that both teams agreed to not record. That isn't true. Verge decided not to record on their own. They carelessly chose to not follow policy and payed for it.
Or who knows, maybe Struk really did toggle since he doesn't care about verGe anymore and assumed Hyper! would be shady themselves, told his team about it afterwards, and as a unit they decided to just claim the whole team didn't record to help Struk out. /conspiracytheory
Seriously though, there's plenty of reasons to have a dim opinion of Hyper! now, especially after what a joke they were in the finals, but there was nothing wrong with them deciding to dispute a player, LAN-proven or not. [b]Obviously.[/b] So quit whining about it.
Submit Comments
Registered Users Only
In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!