|
|||
Going into the CGS World Finals, Richard ‘Dr Gonz0’ Lewis was secure in his notion that European Counter-Strike players were more tactically adept than their American counterparts; but after watching the Carolina Core overpower both the London Mint and Berlin Allianz, he was forced to reconsider his views... ![]() I’d watched the US teams play and had seen nothing there that impressed me to the point where I was going to rethink this view before the world final. I’d watched every minute of the CGS season and it reinforced my view that the teams were too over reliant on their ability to outshoot a team and to rely on the designated AWP users in the side to make those first all important picks on maps. There seemed to be little teamwork, little tactical innovation and a lack of interest in tactical flashing and smoking. When the shooting failed there was no plan B as such and it sometimes spectacularly failed. So yeah, I was confident that the US teams would be up against it when the UK and Europeans came into their backyard. I‘d written an article that I’m so grateful at the time was not published as there would be even more egg on my face right now than there already is through this admission. One paragraph read: “What can you expect from a generation of players that have been brought up with the Hollywood notion of the one bullet proof, everyman, killing machine? John McLain, John Rambo, John Matrix and probably lots of others called John have permeated the conscious in a way that hasn’t happened to their European brethren. This is why they consider it almost an unnecessary insult to have to flash an opponent first and then shoot them down blind. ‘Where is the challenge in that?’ they cry as they Yippee-Ki-Yay their way through a match. Who needs smoke to obscure their vision if they can simply shoot out their eyes from a distance? This is how the American player likes to roll and while it is great to watch it will do them no good when they have to face the likes of Berlin and Stockholm who will use teamwork in a way they’ve not had to play against before. Coordinated flashes will keep players blind for tens of seconds at a time before a wave of aggressors come tearing round a corner and fill everything they can see full of holes. There is no machismo in the way a Euro plays, they don’t want to trade in a series of 1v1s, and they don’t want to make those impossible once in a blue moon shots. They just want to win and have no qualms about shooting you if you’re blind, or even if your back is turned. There was no Wild West in Europe and it will show in the way the teams will perform like well oiled machines when they show the US how it is done.” Now while some of that was tongue in cheek for sure, I genuinely believed that the European teams would have CSS at least in lockdown and the matches would be decided by other games. Yet this proved to be not the case as the inevitable all US final came about. The only side that beat a US CSS team was Birmingham Salvo against Chicago Chimera, the rest of the UK and Euro sides crumbling under the pressure. Even I’d have to say that the reason for this victory was due to the style of play from Salvo being more in keeping with what we were used to from US sides; their players simply came up huge with some breathtaking shooting. Of course, in the long run it didn’t stop a US team taking it home, but it was one of the very few high points of the event looking at it from this side of the water. At one point I really started to believe that my characterization of the US players was bang on as I watched the rush happy brutalization of Singapore at the hands of Carolina. It was crude, savage CSS the likes of which did not impress. The players did things that seemed incredibly stupid and Sam “devour” Chamma, the talisman of the side, looked decidedly ordinary as he tried to hold banana with his AWP. Mark Dolven and I often exchange our views of the games at bizarre times of the day via MSN and I was a little bit chiding when I gave my views of the CSS match. He was displaying his usual self confidence when we caught up moments after his victory in that game and he was telling me how he could not wait to “destroy” London Mint in their upcoming game. I pointed out if the CSS team even played twice as well as they did when I watched them they would lose heavily, an assertion to which he just laughed. “You think we were playing properly?” he asked me, a clear rhetorical question. He went on to hammer home the point “What would be the point in employing our tactics against opponents we can just simply outshoot? Why give London Mint the opportunity to counter our strategies? I think you’ll find my boys were told to freestyle it...” and while I was a little skeptical that this was entirely the case it did make sense to me. Page:
|






User Comments
I wouldn't call them no names but you do have a point. I don't think its coincidence that the only European team to get a result over there was salvo, ALL of which played 1.6 at a top level.
Even saying that, its not as if the US totally rolled every team, imo if the big Euro teams moved over it would be a totally different story.
CGS ruleset... with less time in a round, you have to be faster and there's less time to organize, rotate, fake...etc... so it's quite different... just my 2 cents !
Not commenting on a TV ruleset.
And a special hello to Big Dolven. :D
just kidding, tils > frod
also it helps that the most experienced US players switched over to css for cgs while in europe only a handfull did (mangiacapra red harriman etc.), and not even the best (no offence at all, but you have to admit frod zet storm hanes method etc were without doubt the finest of their country, whereas the finest euros, with the exception of zet, stuck with 1.6
CGS matches are lame. They're way to quick.
hopefully its not, but still. >_>
to make source more accepted, we need the old cfg back..
still some great points made gonzo. Doing the UK proud. My 2 cents would be; not the best .eu teams were picked to play against the cream of the USA crop. Salvo are the only team that matched the US players and it just so happens they were 1.6 players (and far from the best that .eu has to offer on that game).
I think it will continue down this path for a while longer until either the .eu css players find that next level that all of the 1.6 converts are obv on OR more 1.6 teams convert after seeing the success of their 1.6 brethren.
And dont talk about mym or fanatic or 4k, they arent playing source are they? CSS and 1.6 are different games, its like comparing q3 players with q4 players or sc players with war3 players. Yes you see some crossover but there is not a lot of that is there?
You act like euro's "get it" and everyone else in the world are not capable of getting what you guys find so easy. It's like you think euro's were born with clue. No, and it's not culture. It's a style of play that the ROUND TIME forces you to play if you want to win. And America "got it" and the euro's "Don't got it"
More Pages
Submit Comments
Registered Users Only
In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!