cool. these colours must be equally far from on the spectrum from the greyscale in the opposite direction as the real colours, so when your eyes get used to them and it shifts in the other direction, it appears to be coloured correctly.
How can you dumb down an almost illiterate post? Any English professor I've ever had would kill himself if he read this sentence: " these colours must be equally far from on the spectrum from the greyscale in the opposite direction as the real colours."
Didn't someone tell me Jon Dawe was a genius. Oh yeah, Jon Dawe told me that. Figures.
right but neither of your posts have any explanation as to why it works. It's not my fault you're too stupid to understand the explanation. So it's not even close to the same idea, because you don't have any understanding whatsoever of how it works, you're just stating what it is.
It's like the difference between someone saying "this is a car" and someone explaining how it actually moves.
I'm too stupid to understand what you wrote, so you must be stupid for writing it! LOL.
how does that make it dumbed-down? if anything it's smarter bc he actually knows what its called.
(1) its that one theorem where that one side of a right triangle squared plus the other side squared equals that long side squared. (2) pythagorean theorem.
'ridiculously dumbed down'? not in this context sir.
Already explained it, idiot. Saying "it's a negative" doesn't include any understanding of why it causes your eyes to see colours on the black and white image. Once again, it's like if someone asked how a car moves, and he says "it's a car". He has absolutely no understanding of how it works.
so you're assuming, bc he's not an arrogant priss and doesn't describes the entire process and definition of an after image, he doesn't know what it is or how it works?
I know that you, like all other idiots, will keep trying to defend your idiocy. Let me just tell you, you've already lost the argument. Don't bother, you lose.
true, i couldn't have explained how it works. but it's funny that you think you know everything and you think everyone else doesn't know anything. i don't know if he could or could not have explained it and to make that assumption is unfair and pompous.
defend my idiocy??? if a person calls something what it is and doesn't explain in detail the way it works - he/she doesn't know how it works? what?!
btw when was there ever a request for an explanation, and secondly i wasnt trying to offer one. was merely putting a name to what you were describing...my god! YOU CRAZY!?!?!
for a genius you've got a pretty loose grasp on the english language, aether.
also fyi: when you find that much personal satisfaction in knowing things they teach in high school and saying 'i knew/said it first!' over the internet, it just SCREAMS 'i've never seen a vagina.'
how stupid do you same group of people have to be to continually rage at aether? you guys are so set on proving him wrong ONCE that you likely spend more time proofreading your gotfrag posts than you do on something that matters. not only that, but you're giving him the satisfaction of letting him know how upset he makes you. you guys MUST realize this by now, right?
I've always wondered how responding to someone's post or having an opinion equates to anyone being upset. People are just pointing out how annoying Aether is by trolling and how hypocritical it is for someone who is posting in the same forum to say that posting in a forum means having no life.
... and quite honestly, if you actually think someone gets mad over an internet forum, you're stupid. Who the fuck cares what some idiot you're never going to meet or remember said on an internet forum. Grow the fuck up, all of you.
EDIT: Oh, that, and Aether is a self-proclaimed genius. Whether that may be true or not, it still makes him an arrogant, pompous ass. Johnny Bernardy baked this amazingly delicious humble pie this morning; would you like some?
Jesus Christ aether, I hope this stuff is fun for you, because you spend waaaaaay too much of your time arguing on the internet.
You want me to actually explain how it works, just to prove that I do know? Fine, here it is: the colors on the negative image are directly opposite on the color spectrum from the colors of the real image, with grey as the center point. The negative colors are temporarily burned into your retinas by the negative image, so when it become a greyscale image the negative colors combined with the grey create the real colors of the photo. It's a lot like the spots you get on your eyes from looking at a bright light or the sun.
Now, I could have written out that whole paragraph, but simply saying it's a negative image is enough for any halfway intelligent human to understand what happened. But I guess with your significantly enhanced intellect you probably thought that no one else but you could figure out what was going on with that illusion.
Quite honestly, the point of the whole post, which you have wholly ignored, was to point out that your original post was barely literate, and if I didn't know who you were from previous interactions I would have thought you were a japanese hooker. Good day sir.
QUOTE:... and quite honestly, if you actually think someone gets mad over an internet forum, you're stupid. Who the FU.CK cares what some idiot you're never going to meet or remember said on an internet forum. Grow the FU.CK up, all of you.
when your posts are littered with insults and profanity it's a bit hard to conclude anything other than the fact that you're really upset.
... yeah, because profanity on the internet equates to anger, too. Tell me more.
QUOTE:how stupid do you same group of people have to be to continually rage at aether? you guys are so set on proving him wrong ONCE that you likely spend more time proofreading your gotfrag posts than you do on something that matters. not only that, but you're giving him the satisfaction of letting him know how upset he makes you. you guys MUST realize this by now, right?
Oh no, baby Jesus! You insulted us! You must be oh so mad with us, right?
This blew me away
http://poststuff4.entensity.net/110609/im..
more like calling it what it is in scientific terms....
Didn't someone tell me Jon Dawe was a genius. Oh yeah, Jon Dawe told me that. Figures.
like that?
It's like the difference between someone saying "this is a car" and someone explaining how it actually moves.
I'm too stupid to understand what you wrote, so you must be stupid for writing it! LOL.
how does that make it dumbed-down? if anything it's smarter bc he actually knows what its called.
(1) its that one theorem where that one side of a right triangle squared plus the other side squared equals that long side squared. (2) pythagorean theorem.
'ridiculously dumbed down'? not in this context sir.
cool beans, idiot.
defend my idiocy??? if a person calls something what it is and doesn't explain in detail the way it works - he/she doesn't know how it works? what?!
Victory.
right?
Victory.
if i didnt know he didnt know. logic is fun.
White flag.
btw when was there ever a request for an explanation, and secondly i wasnt trying to offer one. was merely putting a name to what you were describing...my god! YOU CRAZY!?!?!
also fyi: when you find that much personal satisfaction in knowing things they teach in high school and saying 'i knew/said it first!' over the internet, it just SCREAMS 'i've never seen a vagina.'
wrecked, bitch.
I just did that to you.
... and quite honestly, if you actually think someone gets mad over an internet forum, you're stupid. Who the fuck cares what some idiot you're never going to meet or remember said on an internet forum. Grow the fuck up, all of you.
EDIT: Oh, that, and Aether is a self-proclaimed genius. Whether that may be true or not, it still makes him an arrogant, pompous ass. Johnny Bernardy baked this amazingly delicious humble pie this morning; would you like some?
You want me to actually explain how it works, just to prove that I do know? Fine, here it is: the colors on the negative image are directly opposite on the color spectrum from the colors of the real image, with grey as the center point. The negative colors are temporarily burned into your retinas by the negative image, so when it become a greyscale image the negative colors combined with the grey create the real colors of the photo. It's a lot like the spots you get on your eyes from looking at a bright light or the sun.
Now, I could have written out that whole paragraph, but simply saying it's a negative image is enough for any halfway intelligent human to understand what happened. But I guess with your significantly enhanced intellect you probably thought that no one else but you could figure out what was going on with that illusion.
Quite honestly, the point of the whole post, which you have wholly ignored, was to point out that your original post was barely literate, and if I didn't know who you were from previous interactions I would have thought you were a japanese hooker. Good day sir.
Please kid, you read my explanation and repeated it. Nice try dork.
when your posts are littered with insults and profanity it's a bit hard to conclude anything other than the fact that you're really upset.
Oh no, baby Jesus! You insulted us! You must be oh so mad with us, right?
More Pages
Submit Comments
Registered Users Only
In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!