Thursday November 26 2009
-
-
-
-
-
Counter-Strike Source
-
0
-
-
Official Design Partner
Story Header

All Games: The CPL on their new tournament format

By: Jason Baker - Published August 10, 2006 at 12:14 AM EDT - Writer Archive
Jason "Alchemist" Baker had a chance to interview Michael Allen, Global Tournament Director of the CPL about some of the rule and format changes the CPL has put in place, enjoy.


CPL has changed its CS format for the first time since 2000 (?) Why did you decide to change?

This is a change we have been discussing internally for the last year. We were not fans of single elimination for teams that travel to the CPL and play only one match and if they lose are completely out of the tournament. We were looking at something that can offer the gamers a better tournament experience at the CPL. The old format was single elimination to double elimination format, but the majority of gamers never made it past the first round. By switching the tournament to group play, we give every team at least three matches to play in a full tournament. We believe that this is going to offer gamers an enhanced experience at the CPL, by giving them more matches against differently skilled teams. The way it worked in the past was that a #1 seeded team played #64, now the way it will work is say #1, #17, #33 and #49 will play each other in group play. There is a better shot for some of those teams to get a win. The other change is going from double elimination to best of 3.

You guys recently announced a new team committee. Did they have any input on this change?

The new committee did help in some of the discussions after we had decided on group play. We discussed single, double and best of three. We debated a few key points before we settled on best of 3. What we took into account was the amount of time for matches and the best way to determine a team’s skill. Going to best of 3 format will give teams a chance to play at least two maps against a team and is a better factor to determine the superior team than just one map.

How many teams advance out of the first stage of group play?

32 teams will advance from the first stage of group play, and move into a second stage of group play.

How will maps be chosen for the best of 3 single elimination format?

The way maps will be chosen is quite different as well. We will have a five map pool and the higher seeded team chooses the map they want and from the four remaining maps the lower seeded team chooses their map. Then the lower seeded team chooses one of the three maps remaining in the pool and that map is discarded, then the higher seeded team does the same with the remaining two maps, leaving one map in the pool that will be played as the tie-breaker should a match go to three maps.

How will ties in group play be dealt with?

We will go by record first and in the event of a tie we will use head-to-head play to determine any remaining ties in group play.

Summer CPL is usually much larger in terms of teams. Will there be more stages of group play or will you limit the number of CS teams to 64 for that event as well?

Well with the time allotted for the CS tournament 64 teams in group play is the most that we can do. We will have some waiting list spots for cancellations and no-shows.

You recently announced that the top 3 CAL I teams would receive berths to the CPL. How will this work?

This CAL I season will determine the seedings that the teams get when they move into the tournament. The online tournament in CAL will be a double elimination format, run over a few weeks and the top 3 teams will receive berths into the CPL Championship Finals.

During the World Tour some events ran side events that were not sanctioned games. Such as a CPL Brazil Counter Strike tournament was not an official tour game so was not subject to CPL rules. What will be the policy for the World Season?

The official games for the CPL World Season are only Counter-Strike 1.6 and Quake 3, these games will follow the CPL rules, policies and regulations. A few National Finals may host other games and those will not be sanctioned by the CPL.

What involvement if any will the CPL core staff have on the World Season events?

The CPL is totally committed to the success of its world partners. While some difficulties should be expected, we have integrated our entire staff to the operational systems of our national partners, have created several share points for free exchange information and have a closer relationship with our partners now than we have ever had before. Overall, we all feel that with the help of our sponsors AMD and ATI, we are raising the bar on global scale deployments of CPL tournaments.

Can we expect any more changes to the CPL format for Winter?

Yes, the way that we seed teams will be changing but that is something that we are still working on with the help of our tournament committees.

User Comments

1
15% Ranking 15% Ranking 15% Ranking 15% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

im bringing sexy back :)
2
27% Ranking 27% Ranking 27% Ranking 27% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

i think cpl is heading in the right direction =)
3
44% Ranking 44% Ranking 44% Ranking 44% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Do the berths the top 3 cal-i teams get mean they get some travel expenses paid for? The format is really great btw. Only problem is the 64 team limit, helps to expand the game if more than 64 teams can go.

This comment was edited at 08/10/2006 2:06 AM
#Premier! Texas LAN team competing in CAL-Ripken
4
78% Ranking 78% Ranking 78% Ranking 78% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

yeah, kinda sucks that only 64 teams can play but other than that the new group play seems awesome!
prostar - #talent
5
26% Ranking 26% Ranking 26% Ranking 26% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

gl
6
56% Ranking 56% Ranking 56% Ranking 56% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Great stuff this will really determine who the best team is. No more coL getting shafted on Nuke or 3D losing to SK on Mill due to overtimes and possibly ruining the tournament for them. GJ CPL!
7
29% Ranking 29% Ranking 29% Ranking 29% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

change the way you build your groups so that all groups are even in seeds. u could copy the scheme cpl europe used for their 2003 event in kopenhagen

in case u wonder why ..
group 1: seed 1 + seed 17 + seed 33 + seed 49
vs
group 16: seed 16 + seed 32 + seed 48 + seed 64

u see? these groups are not even
8
46% Ranking 46% Ranking 46% Ranking 46% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

imo, the cpl changed the format for the better.
Whenever you're feeling down, just remember: SURPRISE BUTTSEKS
9
63% Ranking 63% Ranking 63% Ranking 63% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

I dont think this is a good change, not for the CPL.
the ESWC and the WCG has top teams from 64(?) countries, the cpl has usually around 10-15, sometimes 20 better teams, the rest are random signed up teams.
Now we have group stages, where the first will consist of one team beating the crap out of the rest, another where two team will do this, and then we have one day that might interest people with the best of 3 format (which is too long for me, but fair for the teams).
This works for the wcg and the eswc because every team has a fan base there, from every little country at least a few hundred people wants to watch their guys play. but this is not the case at the CPL, they always had random teams playing randoms on the first one or two rounds, and now they are making this part longer. Two days with around zer0 spectators.

two requests: plese drop cobble, and use the directv rules for the best of three matches (or at least do mr12).
we have to go back
10
11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

I dont really like this, I always liked the difference between ESWC(group play) and CPL(double elimination), it was just more exciting. And with the bo3 format there will be a lot of long boring matches, because the crappy teams get to play a lot, too.
11
8% Ranking 8% Ranking 8% Ranking 8% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Alot of people play at CPL to get recognition. AKA, a CAL-P team with a low or middle score could go to CPL and come in 5th at CPL and then have that on their record, along ith becoming more recognized with other CAL-I teams or even sponsors. Personally, CPL is being changed for the better. Good job, guys :D
I need a TPG team. Upper - Garand/Kar Lower/Middle - anything but 3rd
12
54% Ranking 54% Ranking 54% Ranking 54% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

AMD 64bit... so no more than 64 teams
QX6850 @ 3.33GHz - GTX260 675/1475\2400 - 4GB OCZ 1100Mhz - 7T (6HDs - WD) - Striker Extreme - 1KW
13
72% Ranking 72% Ranking 72% Ranking 72% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

i hope cpl didnt change the rules just becoz some teams didnt win and they are not happy, so we have to change to a more random format to suit everybody, everybody have a better shot to win.
这里是哪? ︻┳═一 I am Hit!
14
61% Ranking 61% Ranking 61% Ranking 61% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#13 this is a less random format than double-elim
#club-sx Fort Drum, NY
15
102% Ranking 102% Ranking 102% Ranking 102% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

The bo3 is only in the single elem part after 2 stages of group play. I really doubt a bad team is going to make it that far so no worries about boring matches.

If you have ever played at a CPL and had to go vs SK or some other top team in the first round after spending a lot of money to come to the event you would be very happy with this rule.

#7 He was giving an example not giving out the real seed groups.
Its a piece of cake to bake a pretty cake.
16
35% Ranking 35% Ranking 35% Ranking 35% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

lol at this interview " This is a change we have been discussing internally for the last year."

so i take it justin blanchard wasnt in on those discussions?? becuase he was very negative to my suggestion in this thread here http://forums.thecpl.com/cgi-bin/ultimate.. (october 2005)

anyway glad to see CPL got there in the end. Good decision!

omg heres one of my posts i think this dude just copied & pasted it!
"group play for example gives teams who turn up a minium of 3 matches against top teams. Alot better than the 1 single elim some get or 2 with double."

i take all credit for this magnificent change :D

This comment was edited at 08/10/2006 12:17 PM
17
72% Ranking 72% Ranking 72% Ranking 72% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#14 just compare the placing of each tournaments each years, and we all see which tournaments was more random than the other.
这里是哪? ︻┳═一 I am Hit!
18
38% Ranking 38% Ranking 38% Ranking 38% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#16 - I was there too! I said that in the last article, but ya. They might of had the idea before you said it, really didn't like the idea when you said it, or something about something. Not sure, but it is still for the best - even if you didn't get credit^_^:P.
Striving for the best, Expecting nothing less, Gamer 4 life.
19
34% Ranking 34% Ranking 34% Ranking 34% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#16 I think Mike meant to say that we've been talking about it this year not for one full year. We appreciate your comments on our forums and if it did have an influence, congratulations. That's what the new CPL is all about.
Angel Munoz
20
35% Ranking 35% Ranking 35% Ranking 35% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

angel thanks and good job with cpl. new sponsor/ new format i hope to see cpl go from strength to strength.

#18 hi , i remember well done to you too :D

This comment was edited at 08/11/2006 11:54 AM
21
32% Ranking 32% Ranking 32% Ranking 32% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Great Improvements.
"That's what the internet is for... slandering others anonimously" - Quote from Jay and Silent Bob
22
131% Ranking 131% Ranking 131% Ranking 131% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Great moves, especially the CAL-i placings, it gives the teams in CAL more of a reason to play and try in online matches.
PSN ID: MrMcdoobie
23
20% Ranking 20% Ranking 20% Ranking 20% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Great read

Submit Comments

Registered Users Only

In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!