|
|||
The Cyberathlete Professional League has released info on a new season for 2009. The CPL is also in talks with several media and gaming technology properties for either acquisition or partnership. Meanwhile, the CPL has announced that it plans on hosting two "large international events" during 2009, one of which to take place in the United States . It has also been revealed that several game titles across multiple platforms are being reviewed for inclusion in these two events as the CPL wants to embrace both "competitive and entertainment titles" in 2009. Stay tuned to GotFrag.com as we will update you on the new CPL season. |



















User Comments
And I don't see any contact information. How does one get in contact with them?
If it is truely a new ownership group, great for them, and while it is a lot to ask from them, but they should pay out the previous prize money that the former ownership group failed to do. If they follow through with paying out the previous winners, and talk to the G7/9 group and get everything in the clear it could be successful once again. However its highly unlikely that the new ownership will just deal out thousands of dollars just to pay back previous winners that they had nothing to do with.
First and foremost proof is needed, that there is a new ownership, and not just the previous guys trying to pull a stunt to get out of paying out the money to the previous winners.
They have to reconstruct the organization from the ground up. IMO, only taking what was good from the "old" CPL and making it better, as well as taking advice from gamers on what they want would be a good idea.
The new CPL is in good hands
SOURCE = will fail like OLD CPL or CGS.
CGS fail because all spectators in this " CGS esports Events " (esports? dude) are paid for see the event and scream: go coL! . I dont need speak about ESWC, WCG , ESL, KODE5 events about spectators in finals, the screens and videos are up in all websites.
If you want be on TV, you can join in big brother and dont need play the false CGS.
#27 Not to support/bash either way but thats exactly what people said about Basketball and Baseball.
I somewhat agree. The downside to watching games on TV currently, is that you can only see what their camera's show you. With things like HLTV you can see any player you want, so you get the liberty of watching your favorite player 100% of the time.
The major plight of the CGS is that the one audience that it caters towards (gamers), don't like it. If they had some kind of online viewer subscription system then maybe they'd be in business. Think of it like the move Death Race, where you can watch all the players (HLTV-style) and can also hear the announcers (Shoutcast\TSN-style) for a low subscription fee (which I guess is unlike the movie).
back to the same old shenanigans
What we all need to do is welcome companies like these and help bring eSports to the forefront. Even though some might be out there to make a quick buck, and some we may think are far too mainstream, we still should take advantage of what they have to offer to make these communities larger and have greater numbers in competition.
As said in the press release on CAL's website
I'm sure we won't see any results just yet! We should sit back and be patient.
Use source= fail and poor again
Use 1.6
You do also realize that JMC, Pandemic, EG have all put their 1.6 teams in for the first season of CGS when it was first introduced. Not only coL and 3D went to "the source" as you would call it. None the less, I think this is a very risky move of them to try and have events go on... if they pay all the players first, then host their events, that will work. Otherwise, I see this as another big failure. Singlecoil is right, press releases are nice, but the gamers want to see action. First step would be to pay all of those who haven't been payed by the previous CPL. After that, they can start talking about what direction they want to take. As for the CGS being a joke or not, yes it does look rediculous in some ways with what they do, but don't stop there. Many gamers want to attend big events and all and the CGS is trying to push gaming forward. Maybe they will fail hard after all, but you can't blame them for at least trying to do something. As they say "You can't fail if you don't do anything"
In which case they are buying the reputation of the CPL. So the gaming community should still hold them accountable for the old debts and actions.
It's more surprising that the money spent buying the tarnished brand name, couldn't have been better spent on the events themselves. You really don't need an established brand name at the moment to have a successful event.
More Pages
Submit Comments
Registered Users Only
In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!