Friday November 27 2009
World of Warcraft
Official Design Partner
Story Header

World of Warcraft: Blizzard talks about WoW Arena

By: Trevor Schmidt - Published May 27, 2008 at 3:32 PM EDT - Writer Archive
Tom Chilton, Lead Game Designer for Blizzard, sits down with GotFrag to talk about the future of WoW Arena.


Blizzard has released sign up information for its WoW Tournament; how do you think the community will react to this years event and what turn out are you expecting?

The community’s reaction has been very positive so far. We’ve used the feedback from last year’s event to refine this year’s structure, and we’re expecting a strong turnout for the tournament.

Blizzard’s tournament last year was the focus of the WoW competitive scene, are you hoping for a similar focus on this years Blizzard tournament?

We aim to hold premiere events every year, and this year is no different. Our intention is to continue running topnotch competitive events that players want to take part in and spectators want to watch.

The idea of “eSports” has been a big part of Blizzard’s corporate strategy, what impact do you think eSports has on the success from a business side for Blizzard and other game developers? We understand that Blizzard has established a dedicated eSports group. Could you comment on what that group is chartered to do?


"We are continuing to explore spectator options for viewing Arena games."

For our company, eSports has been a key to the longevity of several of our titles. With StarCraft celebrating its 10th anniversary, there are still active communities and eSports organizations that support it along with our other titles. The Blizzard eSports group is responsible for developing Blizzard Entertainment’s presence in the increasingly popular eSports scene. Its main role consists of preparing and operating tournaments around the world. Additionally, it provides third-party support for various eSports leagues and communicates balance feedback to the developers.

Blizzard has benefited greatly in Starcraft, Warcraft and other games from its backing by the eSports movement; is Blizzard committed to making WoW as popular in the eSports genre as its other game platforms?

We feel that the introduction of the Arena system created a viable platform for competitive PvP and eSports in World of Warcraft. Since their introduction, the Arenas have remained very popular, and we plan to continue enhancing and building on that aspect of the game.

A big part of “eSports” is the concept of balanced play, level playing field. Yet WoW seems to have an opposite view where it tries to encourage players to spend additional time playing the game and then rewards them for it. How does Blizzard balance these two conflicting situations and will we continue to see this idea of separation of professional players on to “tournament realms”?

We received a lot of feedback from last year’s tournament indicating that players wanted to be able to compete effectively without spending the time to level and equip multiple characters. We used template characters for some of the third-party events we supported last year and eventually developed the format you see in this year’s tournament, in which players create and customize tournament-ready characters. At the end of this year’s tournament, we’ll take all of the feedback we’ve received over the year and make improvements for future tournaments.

It was stated in forum posts that Blizzard doesn’t see all classes and all specs for each classes ever being equally viable in arena/pvp play. With that said, what other changes to character classes is Blizzard considering working on in terms of PVP and arena play?

We’ll continue to work on refining competitive balance and addressing any valid concerns we may find in terms of PvP and Arena play. There are many aspects to the World of Warcraft universe, and we have to be careful that changes made in response to one area of play do not adversely affect other parts of the game. Without going into specifics on upcoming changes, we can say that we constantly evaluate the current state of game balance, as well as how it will be altered by the inclusion of new content, such as the Wrath of the Lich King expansion.

How about the effects any changes could have on PVE play; how does Blizzard balance these two potentially conflicting styles of play?


"We’re looking to add new Arenas for Wrath of the Lich King that may be a bit different from the current Arena environments..."

We have a dedicated team of designers focused on providing the best possible gaming experience for both PvP and PvE aspects of the game. When changes are implemented, they are extensively tested internally and then externally, when we go through our public testing phases on our public test realms (PTRs). These multiple layers of testing and feedback help avoid unwanted consequences when making balance changes.

Where is Blizzard’s priority when it comes to changes made between class dynamics; PVE or PVP?

We strive to evaluate all aspects of World of Warcraft evenly in terms of class dynamics. We want every class to feel unique and useful in instances, raids, Battlegrounds, and Arena play. Ideally, no matter what class a player chooses, he or she will be able to experience and enjoy all aspects of World of Warcraft in one form or another. Players should be able to customize characters by changing equipment, talents, or play styles to correspond to the type of game experience they prefer.

The issue of what race certain characters are makes a big deal in Arena play. Has Blizzard considered any change to the use of racial abilities in Arena and the idea of being “racial’d”?

We like the uniqueness and differentiation that racial abilities add to the conflict and gameplay found in World of Warcraft. However, we’ll continue to evaluate their effect on specific areas of gameplay such as competitive play and make any necessary adjustments. Additionally, with the new tournament format, players can choose any race as part of customizing for tournament play.

*Interview continued on next page.


Related Links


Official MLG WoW PC Circuit Page
MLG WoW PC Circuit Announcement
Registration opens for the MLG WoW PC Circuit
Continued (1/2) »
Page:

User Comments

1
71% Ranking 71% Ranking 71% Ranking 71% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Nerf WoTF

Nice iview, trevor.
2
6% Ranking 6% Ranking 6% Ranking 6% Ranking
+1 Frags
+   -

WoW arena is dead. It's not spectator friendly to enough people to make it sucessful. Only way WoW could be competitive and spectator friendly would be competitive BGs. Focussing on how a player hits his/her pummel fast enough is not spectator friendly. More class make ups, having more than 1 strategy for a single match, and being able to switch in players (if possible) during a game so that 1 team's make up doesnt dominate the entire match (counter-comping, but with the cost of new players having to wait a certain duration). And yes, I've been there, I hit gladiator season 1 only to get the netherdrake and it is never going to be an e-sport if Blizzard continues doing arena.
3
50% Ranking 50% Ranking 50% Ranking 50% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Personally I hate grinding honor points in BG's for resilience honor gear.

- Full 5/5 Veng Rogue
Part-time GotFrag Writer - Fulltime Dr Pepper Enthusiast
4
41% Ranking 41% Ranking 41% Ranking 41% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

It feels like blizzard will never create WoW to be a pure PVP competitive game. They will always be balancing WoW between PVE and PVP environments. Failure is a plausible option.
Rape :: Stains

i agree with #2. bgs is the way too go. watching arena is boring as hell.
6
34% Ranking 34% Ranking 34% Ranking 34% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

the first round of blizzard's online 3v3 tournament ended a week ago, and they still haven't announced the winners or anything.

pretty much a joke.

This comment was edited at 05/27/2008 5:04 PM
7
23% Ranking 23% Ranking 23% Ranking 23% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

I wish a mage was a viable class for the arena.
/ggrhino
8
33% Ranking 33% Ranking 33% Ranking 33% Ranking
+1 Frags
+   -

"Without giving away too many details, here's a bunch of useless information you should all already know. We look at each aspect of the game and consider any adjustments to improve it, while taking into consideration the effects it will have on other areas of play, and we always test it on our PTR's extensively before implementing them."

Pretty much what I took from every answer. Poor interview.

This comment was edited at 05/27/2008 7:00 PM
hello
9
1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking
+1 Frags
+   -

You should have just posted your questions, it's not like Chilton actually answered any of them.
10
89% Ranking 89% Ranking 89% Ranking 89% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

wow, they actually listen to feedback?
11
33% Ranking 33% Ranking 33% Ranking 33% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Heh, Let's all QQ about Warrior-Druid.. I play Dual rogue 2v2 2400 on BWL <- Gøre
Also 2300 3v3 with dual rogue druid...

So for those who say WoW takes no SKILL<- Holla at me can get down on PTR equal gear.
And if you say people who play WoW sucks at cs hit me up #volition ill smack ur team down, late

/epeen stroke off
Hmm
12
33% Ranking 33% Ranking 33% Ranking 33% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

http://img220.imageshack.us/my.php?image=..

Thats current :(

This comment was edited at 05/27/2008 9:35 PM
Hmm
13
30% Ranking 30% Ranking 30% Ranking 30% Ranking
+3 Frags
+   -

octane you blow at CS
14
34% Ranking 34% Ranking 34% Ranking 34% Ranking
+1 Frags
+   -

.......................
=]
15
85% Ranking 85% Ranking 85% Ranking 85% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

wOw~ is bad.
16
11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking 11% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Extremely vague answers that didn't do much answering at all. WoW will never live up to being a competitive 'esport'.
#team.essence
17
66% Ranking 66% Ranking 66% Ranking 66% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

why does everything have to be a competitive ESPORT? just play the game cause it's fun, not like any of you will be making money off the game anytime soon.
18
29% Ranking 29% Ranking 29% Ranking 29% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

what a crap interview, for each question there's a whole paragraph of empty.
19
19% Ranking 19% Ranking 19% Ranking 19% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

very poor vague answers - hate blizzard since they killed my enhancement shaman
20
1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

QUOTE:
Since their introduction, the Arenas have remained very popular


This sentence alone proves how out of touch Mr Chilton is with the players. You don't have to read the official PvP forums for long before you realise that most people only play Arena because you have to in order to complete your Season gear set. This makes it basically compulsory, not popular.

You could say that working must be popular because so many people do it. Does anyone really believe this is true?

This comment was edited at 05/29/2008 2:19 AM
21
37% Ranking 37% Ranking 37% Ranking 37% Ranking
-1 Frags
+   -

yea blizzard owns cause they actually listen to the community when it comes to the competitive scene or to further eSports...unlike valve who doesnt care much about 1.6 anymore since source has better graphics.
- e-Sports Broadcaster -
22
7% Ranking 7% Ranking 7% Ranking 7% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

WOW SUX
23
69% Ranking 69% Ranking 69% Ranking 69% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Cool.
24
8% Ranking 8% Ranking 8% Ranking 8% Ranking
-2 Frags
+   -

World of Warcrap !!!
25
9% Ranking 9% Ranking 9% Ranking 9% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

"We’re looking to add new Arenas for Wrath of the Lich King that may be a bit different from the current Arena environments..."

Yes, worry about adding new arena's instead of at least attempting to make all classes pvp balanced...

priorities are definetly in order

Submit Comments

Registered Users Only

In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!